Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Future global land datasets with a 1-km resolution based on the SSP-RCP scenarios

Authors: Chen, Guangzhao; Li, Xia; Liu, Xiaoping;

Future global land datasets with a 1-km resolution based on the SSP-RCP scenarios

Abstract

The continuous strengthening of human activities and intensification of climate change have jointly affected global land cover changes. Scenario-based land change simulation has been widely used as a powerful tool that can assess the impact of potential land changes. However, the current future land projection products at a global scale generally suffer from deficiencies such as low resolution, unsuitable scenarios, and few types of land. Therefore, we propose a series global land projection datasets with a resolution of 1-km from 2015 to 2100, which uses the latest IPCC coupling scenarios of socioeconomic and climate change, SSP-RCP. Actually, there are two subdatasets: 1) the 1-km global LULC dataset containing seven land types; 2) the 1-km global PFT-based land dataset containing 20 land types. The production of the LULC dataset combines the top-down land demand constraints provided by the official dataset of CMIP6 and the bottom-up spatial simulation executed by cellular automata (CA). The land demand from official data sources ensures the authority of the land trajectories under different SSP-RCP scenarios. The CA model is executed separately in different regions of the world to reflect spatial heterogeneity. Based on the LULC dataset, we further subdivide the its land types into 20 types according to climate data. The results show that our global land simulation achieves a satisfactory accuracy. The spatial change of various land types in each scenario appropriately reflects the storyline of the corresponding scenario. We believe that our dataset can provide stronger data support for climate research, including climate models, due to its advantages in resolution, scenarios, and land types. Please cite the corresponding paper: Chen, G., Li, X. & Liu, X. Global land projection based on plant functional types with a 1-km resolution under socio-climatic scenarios. Sci Data 9, 125 (2022).

Related Organizations
Keywords

PFT, global, SSP-RCP, land-use/land-cover change

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 517
    download downloads 340
  • 517
    views
    340
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
4
Top 10%
Average
Average
517
340