Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

CrowdEEG Dataset: Expert Adjudication Discussions for Medical Time Series Data

Authors: Mike Schaekermann; Andrew Lim; Kate Larson; Edith Law;

CrowdEEG Dataset: Expert Adjudication Discussions for Medical Time Series Data

Abstract

This repository contains a dataset for a medical time series classification task acquired using CrowdEEG. Beyond classification labels, the dataset includes structured arguments from adjudication discussions of 3 medical experts per contentious classification decision. The corpus has been referenced in the following papers: Mike Schaekermann, Graeme Beaton, Elaheh Sanoubari, Andrew Lim, Kate Larson, and Edith Law: Ambiguity-aware AI Assistants for Medical Data Analysis. CHI 2020. Mike Schaekermann, Graeme Beaton, Minahz Habib, Andrew Lim, Kate Larson, and Edith Law: Understanding Expert Disagreement in Medical Data Analysis through Structured Adjudication. CSCW 2019. This repository only contains classification labels and adjudication arguments, not the raw medical time series records. Please reach out to Mike Schaekermann (mikeschaekermann@gmail.com) to request access to the underlying raw time series data. A statement of purpose and proof of your institutional ethics clearance may be required. If you find this data useful in your research, please consider citing: @inproceedings{Schaekermann2020AmbiguityAwareAI, Author = {Schaekermann, Mike and Beaton, Graeme and Sanoubari, Elaheh and Lim, Andrew and Larson, Kate and Law, Edith}, Title = {Ambiguity-Aware AI Assistants for Medical Data Analysis}, Year = {2020}, ISBN = {9781450367080}, Publisher = {Association for Computing Machinery}, Address = {New York, NY, USA}, DOI = {10.1145/3313831.3376506}, Pages = {1–14}, Numpages = {14}, Location = {Honolulu, HI, USA}, Series = {CHI '20} }

Related Organizations
Keywords

Ambiguity, Medical Data Analysis, Adjudication

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 6
    download downloads 1
  • 6
    views
    1
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
2
Average
Average
Average
6
1
Related to Research communities