Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
addClaim

MLE11_MLE06_presentation_2022-09-01_13-39-33_0000075

Authors: Ey, Elodie; Cahill, Emma;

MLE11_MLE06_presentation_2022-09-01_13-39-33_0000075

Abstract

Rats were purchased from Janvier Laboratories at 6 weeks of age. Upon arrival, rats were housed in pairs that were conserved throughout the experiment. After one week of acclimation, we identified each individual with a subcutaneous Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) tag (APT12 PIT tags; Biomark, Inc., Boise, The United States of America) inserted under gas anaesthesia (Isoflurane) with local analgesia (Lidor 20 mg/ml, with 40μl/10g). RFID tags were positioned in the lower part of the left flank. Rats were allowed to recover for at least ten days. We recorded dyadic interactions between two unfamiliar male rats of the same age (12–14 weeks of age). The focal animal encountered an unfamiliar animal of the same sex for one hour, in the LRT setup, with bedding. Light is diminished to 26 lux (within the cage). The two animals are left undisturbed for one hour. We coupled the Live Rat Tracker (LRT) system (https://micecraft. org/lmt; version 931) with the Avisoft Ultrasound Gate 416 (300kHz sampling rate, 16-bit format; trigger: level of this channel; pre-trigger: 1s; hold time: 1s; duration: >0.005s; trigger event: 2% energy in 25–125kHz with entropy <50%; Avisoft Bioacoustics, Glienecke, Germany) connected to a CM16/CMPA microphone (Avisoft Bioacoustics, Glienecke, Germany). LRT and Avisoft systems were synchronised.

Keywords

male, ultrasonic vocalisations, rat, USV

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average