Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
addClaim

Towards Robust Machine Learning in Geotech: An Audit of Methodological Errors and Corrected Protocols (Data and Code)

Authors: Tiwary, Kartik;

Towards Robust Machine Learning in Geotech: An Audit of Methodological Errors and Corrected Protocols (Data and Code)

Abstract

This repository contains the data, code and figures supporting the study "Methodological practice in geotechnical machine learning: a systematic audit and reproduction study". The study audits a stratified random sample of 149 machine-learning studies in geotechnical engineering, published between 2020 and 2025 across fifteen journals, against eleven methodological error classes spanning data leakage, model evaluation, reporting and reproducibility, and reproduces four of those studies under corrected, structure-respecting evaluation protocols. The deposit includes the audit protocol and coding rubric (codebook); the complete coding sheet, in which all 149 studies are identified by DOI and coded for the eleven error classes, together with the independent codes for the 26 double-coded studies and the screening log; metadata for the 150 sampled studies; the analysis code reproducing the prevalence statistics, inter-rater agreement and Cohen's kappa reported in the paper; the four reproduction scripts; and the figures. The datasets used in the reproductions belong to the original studies and are not redistributed here; instructions for obtaining them are provided in the repository. All random seeds are fixed for reproducibility, and software versions and run instructions are given in the README.

Keywords

model evaluation, Data set, cross validation, Geotechnical Engineering, ML, reproducibility

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average