Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
addClaim

Seed morpho-anatomical traits, but not seed water absorption dynamics, differ between cultivated and wild plant species

Authors: Milla, Rubén; Vandelook, Filip; Elias, Soltani; Keyvan, Maleki;

Seed morpho-anatomical traits, but not seed water absorption dynamics, differ between cultivated and wild plant species

Abstract

· Seed water uptake is the first physiological process initiating germination, yet broad-scale variation in seed imbibition dynamics across plant species remains poorly explored. · Here, we compiled a global dataset of 203 species representing 64 families and quantified maximum water absorption capacity, water uptake rate, lag phase, seed mass, seed coat thickness, embryo-to-seed length ratio (EL/SL), and embryo-to-seed surface ratio (ES/SS). Phylogenetic comparative analyses were used to evaluate trait variation, phylogenetic signal, and evolutionary optima. · Cultivated species differed most consistently from wild species in seed morphology, showing larger seed mass, thinner seed coats, and lower embryo-to-seed ratios. In contrast, water absorption traits showed limited evidence of consistent differentiation between cultivated and wild species. Phylogenetic signal was generally strong for seed morphological traits, whereas hydration dynamics, particularly lag phase, exhibited weaker and more variable phylogenetic structure. Models suggested distinct evolutionary optima in cultivated versus wild species for several seed morphological traits, particularly seed mass, seed coat thickness, and embryo ratios whereas support for divergence in evolutionary optima of water absorption traits was comparatively weaker. · This study provides an evolutionary framework for understanding variation in seed functional traits and highlights seed water relations as an important but underexplored axis of plant functional biology.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average