
This article investigates the use and expression of euphemisms in newspaper texts, focusing on their role as strategic linguistic tools in media discourse. Euphemisms, which replace direct or potentially offensive terms with milder or socially acceptable alternatives, are widely employed in political, economic, and social reporting to manage sensitive topics, maintain editorial neutrality, and influence reader perception. The study examines the linguistic and stylistic strategies newspapers use to construct euphemisms, including lexical substitution, metaphorical phrasing, nominalization, and circumlocution. By analyzing the distribution, frequency, and function of euphemistic expressions, the research highlights their importance in shaping tone, framing information, and reflecting cultural and ideological norms. The findings contribute to a better understanding of media language, discourse strategies, and the socio-pragmatic mechanisms underlying the presentation of delicate or controversial subjects in contemporary journalism.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
