Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

TYPOLOGICAL CONTRAST OF PHONETIC LEVEL UNITS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK: A THEORETICAL APPROACH

Authors: Mahsud Husanov Islamovich, Orif Bozorov Chamanovich; Worldy Knovledge Publishing Centre;

TYPOLOGICAL CONTRAST OF PHONETIC LEVEL UNITS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK: A THEORETICAL APPROACH

Abstract

This article provides a contrastive and typological analysis of phonetic level units in the English and Uzbek languages. The study is based on phoneme theory, vowel and consonant systems, phonotactic patterns, and suprasegmental features. In English, vowel oppositions are numerous, diphthongs are present, vowel length has phonological significance, and a free stress system plays an important role in distinguishing meaning at both word and sentence levels. In contrast, the Uzbek language demonstrates phonotactic regularity, agglutinative morphology, and a relatively stable stress pattern, while pronunciation is generally more systematic and simplified.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average