Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Comparing the performance of functional versus taxonomic metagenomics for detecting ammonia disturbances in the biogas system: functional and taxonomic annotation, gene counts and FAN concentrations

Authors: Boers, Dries;

Comparing the performance of functional versus taxonomic metagenomics for detecting ammonia disturbances in the biogas system: functional and taxonomic annotation, gene counts and FAN concentrations

Abstract

The study archives contain the results of sequence processing. These files suffice for reproducing the statistical analysis. Filename Content [sample].emapper.annotations Functional annotations CAT.ORF2LCA_incl_names.txt Taxonomic annotations gene_counts.tsv Gene counts As described in the publication, genes were predicted using Prodigal, and then functionally and taxonomically annotated using eggNOG-mapper 2 and CAT. Reads were aligned to genes using Bowtie 2, and then counted using featureCounts. Free ammonia nitrogen (FAN) concentrations have been included to allow for reproducing the linear regularized regression. These concentrations have been statistically standardized. They are saved in the RDS format, used by R. Detailed sample descriptions can be found in the European Nucleotide Archive under accession number PRJEB91257.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average