Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Pure University of M...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
https://dx.doi.org/10.48420/20...
Dataset . 2023
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
https://dx.doi.org/10.48420/20...
Dataset . 2023
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 5 versions
addClaim

Research data for "Subjective data models in bioinformatics: Do wet-lab and computational biologists comprehend data differently?"

Authors: Yehudi, Yochannah; Goble, Carole; Jay, Caroline; Hughes-Noehrer, Lukas; Department of Computer Science; Information Management; Human Computer Systems;

Research data for "Subjective data models in bioinformatics: Do wet-lab and computational biologists comprehend data differently?"

Abstract

Subjective data models dataset This dataset is comprised of data collected from study participants, for a study into how people working with biological data perceive data, and whether or not this perception of data aligns with a person's experiential and educational background. We call the concept of what data looks like to an individual a "subjective data model". Todo: link paper/preprint once published. Computational python analysis code: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7022789 and https://github.com/yochannah/subjective-data-models-analysis Files **Transcripts** of the recorded sessions are attached and have been verified by a second researcher. These files are all in plain text .txt format. Note that participant 3 did not agree to sharing the transcript of their interview. **Interview paper files** This folder has digital and photographed versions of the files shown to the participants for the file mapping task. Note that the original files are from the NCBI and from FlyBase. Videos and stills from the recordings have been deleted in line with the Data Management Plan and Ethical Review. `anonymous_participant_list.csv` shows which files have transcripts associated (not all participants agreed to share transcripts), what the order of Tasks A and B were, the date of interview, and what entities participants added to the set provided (if any). See the paper methods for more info about why entities were added to the set. `cards.txt` is a full list of the cards presented in the tasks. `background survey` and `background manual annotations` are the select survey data about participant background and manual additions to this where necessary, e.g. to interpret free text. `codes.csv` shows the qualitative codes used within the transcripts. `entry_point.csv` is a record of participants' identified entry points into the data. `file_mapping_responses` shows a record of responses to the file mapping task.

Country
United Kingdom
Related Organizations
Keywords

mental models, card-sorting, bioinformatics, Human-centred computing not elsewhere classified, subjective data models

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities