Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Dataset . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

4-class code-VEP EEG data

Authors: Cabrera Castillos, Kalou;

4-class code-VEP EEG data

Abstract

Participants Twelve healthy volunteers (4 women, mean age: 30.6 years, standard deviation: 7.1), all students and staff at ISAE-SUPAERO with normal or corrected-to-normal vision took part in this study. None of the participants reported any of the exclusion criteria (neurological antecedents and being under psychoactive medication at the time of the study). The study was approved by the ethics committee of the University of Toulouse (CER approval number 2020-334) and was carried in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki. Participants gave informed written consent prior to the experiment. Experimental protocol EEG data were recorded using a BrainProduct LiveAmp 32 active electrodes wet-EEG setup with a refresh rate of 500Hz to record the surface brain activity. The 32 electrodes followed the 10-20 international system. The ground electrode was placed at the FPz electrode location and all electrodes were referenced to the FCz electrode. The electrode impedances were brought below 25kOhm before the recording. EEG data and markers were synchronized during recording using Lab Streaming Layer. Participants were comfortably sat and requested to read and sign the informed consent. Once equipped with the EEG system, volunteers were asked to focus on four targets that were cued sequentially in a random order for 0.5s, followed by a 2.2s stimulation phase, before a 0.7s inter-trial period. The cue sequence for each trial was pseudo-random and different for each block. After each block, a pause was observed and subjects had to press the space bar to continue. In total, each volunteer was presented fifteen four-trial blocks for each of the four conditions, 2 types of c-VEP codes x 2 different amplitudes depth (40% or 100%). The four flickers were all 150 pixels wide discs, without borders, and were presented on the following LCD monitor: Dell P2419HC, 1920x1080 pixels, 265cd/m2, and 60Hz refresh rate. Preprocessing No pre-processing was applied on these data, and they have been neither sliced or epoched, although it remains possible to do so with the help of the markers.

Keywords

code-VEP, visual stimuli, EEG

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 18
    download downloads 1
  • 18
    views
    1
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
1
Average
Average
Average
18
1