Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.5121/ijpla.2016.6201 , 10.5281/zenodo.1206333 , 10.5281/zenodo.1206332 , 10.5281/zenodo.4528918 , 10.5281/zenodo.8227365 , 10.5281/zenodo.4049750 , 10.5281/zenodo.8227366 , 10.5281/zenodo.4054670 , 10.5281/zenodo.4738978 , 10.5281/zenodo.4738979 , 10.5281/zenodo.4049749 , 10.5281/zenodo.4528919 , 10.5281/zenodo.4054671
doi: 10.5121/ijpla.2016.6201 , 10.5281/zenodo.1206333 , 10.5281/zenodo.1206332 , 10.5281/zenodo.4528918 , 10.5281/zenodo.8227365 , 10.5281/zenodo.4049750 , 10.5281/zenodo.8227366 , 10.5281/zenodo.4054670 , 10.5281/zenodo.4738978 , 10.5281/zenodo.4738979 , 10.5281/zenodo.4049749 , 10.5281/zenodo.4528919 , 10.5281/zenodo.4054671
This study aims to determine the attitudes of individuals towards computer programming in terms of various variables. The study group consists of the students of Kastamonu University Department of Computer Education and Instructional Technologies Teaching (CEIT), Department of Computer Engineering, and Department of Computer Programming. Data were collected via Attitude towards Computer Programming Scale (AtCPS).The results of this study show that students have neutral attitudes towards computer programming in general. Male computer programming students have significantly higher attitudes towards programming in comparison to female computer programming students. In addition, attitude towards computer programming statistically varies by grade. The higher is grade, the lower is attitude. The more time CEIT and computer programming students spend on computer for programming purposes daily, the more positive attitudes they have towards programming. Attitude significantly varies by graduated high school only among CEIT students
Programming; attitude towards programming; attitude scale
Programming; attitude towards programming; attitude scale
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 17 | |
| downloads | 19 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts