Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Bandits with Knapsacks (BwK) is a MultiArmed Bandit (MAB) problem under supply/budget constraints. Risk scoring is a typical limited-resource problem and as such can be modeled as a BwK problem. This paper tries to solve the triple problem in risk scoring – accuracy, fairness, and auditability by proposing FuzzyBwK application in risk scoring. Theoretical assessment of FuzzyBwK is made to establish whether the regret function would perform better than StochasticBwK and AdversarialBwK functions. An empirical experiment is then set with secondary data (Australian and German credit data) and primary data (Kakamega insurance data) to determine whether the algorithm proposed would be fit for the proposed problem. The results show that the proposed algorithm has optimal regret function and from the empirical test, the algorithm satisfies the test of accuracy, fairness and auditability.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 9 | |
| downloads | 10 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts