Data and Code for "Value dissonance in research(er) assessment: Individual and institutional priorities in review, promotion and tenure criteria related to research quality, quantity, openness and responsibility"

Name: Data and Code for "Value dissonance in research(er) assessment: Individual and institutional priorities in review, promotion and tenure criteria related to research quality, quantity, openness and responsibility"
Keywords: Open Science, Promotion, Review and Tenure, Research Assessment, Code and data

Pontika, Nancy; Klebel, Thomas; Knoth, Petr; Ross-Hellauer, Tony

Found an issue? Give us feedback

ZENODOarrow_drop_down

ZENODO

Dataset . 2022

License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/legalcode

Data sources: Datacite

ZENODO

Dataset . 2022

License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/legalcode

Data sources: Datacite

Data and Code for "Value dissonance in research(er) assessment: Individual and institutional priorities in review, promotion and tenure criteria related to research quality, quantity, openness and responsibility"

Research datakeyboard_double_arrow_right Dataset 22 Dec 2022 English Publisher:ZenodoFunded by:EC | ON-MERRIT

Authors: Pontika, Nancy; Klebel, Thomas; Knoth, Petr; Ross-Hellauer, Tony;

doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7472276 , 10.5281/zenodo.7467331

Data and Code for "Value dissonance in research(er) assessment: Individual and institutional priorities in review, promotion and tenure criteria related to research quality, quantity, openness and responsibility"

- Summary
- Subjects
- Related research
  (1)
- Metrics

Abstract

This snapshot contains code and data for the preprint "Value dissonance in research(er) assessment: Individual and institutional priorities in review, promotion and tenure criteria related to research quality, quantity, openness and responsibility". Instructions on re-using the data and running the code can be found in the README.md. Changes: Added survey instrument and informed consent.

Related Organizations

The Open University
United Kingdom

Keywords

Open Science, Promotion, Review and Tenure, Research Assessment, Code and data

1 Research products, page 1 of 1

on-merrit/RPT-survey-analysis: Data and Code for "Value dissonance in research(er) assessment: Individual and institutional priorities in review, promotion and tenure criteria related to research quality, quantity, openness and responsibility"
2022HasVersion

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	0
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average