Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

FAIRCORE4EOSC RSAC component specifications

Authors: Di Cosmo, Roberto; Gruenpeter, Morane; Nielsen, Lars Holm; Hugo, Wim; Amehd, Ramy-Badr; Monteil, Alain; Medves, Maud; +3 Authors

FAIRCORE4EOSC RSAC component specifications

Abstract

In 2021, the Scholarly Infrastructures of Research Software (SIRS) report, was published including a set of recommendations to allow EOSC to include software, in the scholarly ecosystem, next to publications and data. The SIRS report was built upon a survey and documentation of a representative panel of notable operational infrastructures across Europe, comparing their scopes and approaches. A subset of these Research Software infrastructures joined forces to turn the SIRS recommendations into reality through the FAIRCORE4EOSC project. One of the objectives of WP6 is to develop tools and services for archival, reference, description and citation of research software artifacts, by implementing the key recommendations of the EOSC SIRS report to interconnect scholarly repositories, publishers and aggregators with the Software Heritage universal source code archive, using the CodeMeta standard, and the Software Heritage intrinsic identifiers (SWHID). In this zenodo deposit, we have a snapshot of the six specifications documents created for the infrastructures that are contributing to the FAIRCORE4EOSC project as part of WP6. Three teams were assigned three tasks, each team developed for each infrastructure a specifications document to follow, the tasks are divided by infrastructure type: T6.1 API and Connectors Between Scholarly Repositories and Software Heritage [M1-M36] Lead: CERN, Participants: KNAW-DANS, GWDG, INRIA, FONDATION INRIA, DATACITE T6.2 API and Connectors Between Open Access Publishers and Software Heritage [M1-M36] Lead: LZI Participants: INRIA, FONDATION INRIA T6.3 API and Connectors Between Aggregators and Software Heritage [M1-M36] Lead: FIZ Participants: INRIA, FONDATION INRIA, DATACITE, OPENAIRE, LZI The RSAC sub-components specification documents by infrastructure type: Scholarly repositories: InvenioRDM - SWH SPECS DataVerse - SWH SPECS Publishers: Dagstuhl - SWH SPECS Episciences - SWH SPECS Aggregators: SwMath - SWH SPECS OpenAire - SWH SPECS The specifications documents are a blueprint for the development of the APIs and connectors from various scholarly infrastructures. Building APIs and connectors in different research software infrastructures for a more connected scholarly ecosystem is a significant step toward the realization of the SIRS report and its recommendations. In the SIRS report, long term preservation, describing research software with machine actionable metadata standards and the usage of the SWHID as persistent software artifact identification are part of the specifications submitted by the partners in the FAIRCORE4EOSC WP6. References SIRS report is the Scholarly infrastructures for research software: report from the EOSC Executive Board Working Group (WG) Architecture Task Force (TF)- https://doi.org/10.2777/28598

Keywords

Curation, Reference, Cite, Describe, Archive, Research software, Scholarly infrastructure

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 50
    download downloads 51
  • 50
    views
    51
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
50
51
Green
Related to Research communities
OpenAIRE