Downloads provided by UsageCounts
In this white paper we address the scholarly community of historians. We argue that replication, or in more precise terminology: reproduction, is possible in historiography, and that it deserves a place in historical practice. Historical reproduction will complement and improve existing mechanisms of historical quality control such as referencing and peer review. Moreover, it will help to uncover the rules guiding historical work and will, in turn, improve the degree of methodological articulation and sophistication of historians.
reproduction, open science, replicability, questionable research practices, datafication
reproduction, open science, replicability, questionable research practices, datafication
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 129 | |
| downloads | 100 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts