Surface texture analysis in Toothfrax and MountainsMap® SSFA module: Different software packages, different results? [ConfoMap analysis]

Authors: Calandra, Ivan; Bob, Konstantin; Merceron, Gildas; Blateyron, François; Hildebrandt, Andreas; Schulz-Kornas, Ellen; Souron, Antoine; +1 Authors

doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4312608 , 10.5281/zenodo.6645445

Surface texture analysis in Toothfrax and MountainsMap® SSFA module: Different software packages, different results? [ConfoMap analysis]

- Summary
- Related research
  (10)
- Metrics

Abstract

This record is a supplementary material to the pre-print with the DOI 10.5281/zenodo.7219877. It contains the results of the 3D surface texture analysis on surfaces from three datasets: Sheep's teeth Guinea pig's teeth Lithic flakes Each surface has been processed in batch with a template. The result of the analysis on each surface is saved in MNT format (including all original and processed surfaces, as well as results) and exported to a PDF file. Ultimately, the results are collated into CSV files (see 10.5281/zenodo.7219855). The analysis has been performed with ConfoMap (a derivative of MountainsMap) v. 8.2.9767.

Related Organizations

University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
Germany
Leipzig University
Germany
Institute of Mechanics and Engineering
France
University of Tokyo
Japan
Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Germany

View all View all

10 Research products, page 1 of 1

Surface texture analysis in Toothfrax and MountainsMap® SSFA module: Different software packages, different results?
2022IsSupplementTo
Dental microwear texture analysis in Toothfrax and MountainsMap® SSFA module: Different software packages, different results? [pre-print + SI]
2021IsSupplementTo
tracer-monrepos/SSFAcomparisonPaper: Revisions for PCI Archaeology
2022IsSupplementedBy
Back to the edge: relative coordinate system for use-wear analysis [complement to Online Resource 3]
2018IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
Dental microwear texture analysis in Toothfrax and MountainsMap® SSFA module: Different software packages, different results? [ConfoMap analysis]
2021HasVersion
Dental microwear texture analysis in Toothfrax and MountainsMap® SSFA module: Different software packages, different results? [ConfoMap analysis]
2021IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
Surface texture analysis in Toothfrax and MountainsMap® SSFA module: Different software packages, different results? [pre-print + SI]
2022IsSupplementTo
Dental microwear texture analysis in Toothfrax and MountainsMap® SSFA module: Different software packages, different results? [ConfoMap analysis]
2020HasVersion
Dental microwear texture analysis in Toothfrax and MountainsMap® SSFA module: Different software packages, different results? [ConfoMap analysis]
2020IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
The effect of numerical aperture on quantitative use-wear studies and its implication on reproducibility [complement to Supplementary Material 2]
2018IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	0
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average