Downloads provided by UsageCounts
To put the FAIR principles into practice research projects need to make choices, assisted by the professional support staff in their organisations. Research performing organisations (RPOs) therefore need to offer a supportive environment for selecting data, services, and repositories. Consider these choices from the investigators��� point of view. As a researcher, how should my project decide which data, of all that it produces, it should focus effort to make FAIR? Of all the services available, how do we identify some that will help manage data in a FAIR way? And which of the multitude of repositories we could potentially use to safeguard the data at the end of the project should we choose to do that? This guide aims to help organisations assess the support they offer researchers, data stewards and others whose role involves making such choices.
repository selection, FAIR principles, research data appraisal, data selection, FAIR implementation, research data appraisal, data selection, repository selection, FAIR principles, FAIR services, implementation, FAIR services
repository selection, FAIR principles, research data appraisal, data selection, FAIR implementation, research data appraisal, data selection, repository selection, FAIR principles, FAIR services, implementation, FAIR services
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 63 | |
| downloads | 56 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts