Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Annotation guidelines used for the construction of the annotations of chemical-protein interactions between Chemical Entities Mentions (CEMs) and Gene and Protein Related Objects (named as GPROs throughout this manuscript). Introduction The annotation guidelines have been refined after iterative cycles of annotations of sample documents. It also incorporated suggestions made by curators as well as observations of annotation inconsistencies encountered when comparing results from different human curators. These guidelines provide curation rules to evaluate if a sentence within an abstract contains a description of a chemical-protein interaction; in particular, if sufficient detail/evidence is provided for co-mentioned CEMs and GPROs. Additionally, it describes curation rules and definitions to assign each identified CHEMPROT to any of the 5 classes and 16 subclasses predefined. Please, cite: @inproceedings{krallinger2017overview, title={Overview of the BioCreative VI chemical-protein interaction Track}, author={Krallinger, Martin and Rabal, Obdulia and Akhondi, Saber A and P{\'e}rez, Mart{\i}n P{\'e}rez and Santamar{\'\i}a, Jes{\'u}s and Rodr{\'\i}guez, Gael P{\'e}rez and others}, booktitle={Proceedings of the sixth BioCreative challenge evaluation workshop}, volume={1}, pages={141--146}, year={2017}} Related Resources: Web DrugProt corpus Evaluation library Online evaluation (CodaLab) Relation annotation guidelines Gene and protein annotation guidelines Chemicals and drugs annotation guidelines DrugProt Silver Standard Knowledge Graph FAQ DrugProt Large Scale Additional SubTrack DrugProt Large Scale document collection protocol DrugProt Complete PubMed Knowledge Graph
biocreative, drugprot, relation extraction, biomedical NLP, NLP
biocreative, drugprot, relation extraction, biomedical NLP, NLP
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 83 | |
| downloads | 134 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts