Downloads provided by UsageCounts
This is a concept for a digital tool that allows verification of, and reflecting on the citations within scientific publications. Authors with an ORCID id would be allowed to verify whether other papers cite their previously published papers/material accurately, and if needed can reflect on how their work was cited. Other researchers too, who have an ORCID id will be allowed to make comments about citations. Cited authors are granted more visibility and authority over discussions about a quote/paraphrased sentence.
Inaccurate citations, Editorial process, Post-publication peer-review, Annotations, Research integrity, Responsibilities
Inaccurate citations, Editorial process, Post-publication peer-review, Annotations, Research integrity, Responsibilities
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 52 | |
| downloads | 3 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts