Downloads provided by UsageCounts
As part of its mission to reduce the uncertainty of preconstruction wind resource estimates, the Consortium for the Advancement for Remote Sensing (CFARS) is engaged in a survey of correction techniques for remote wind sensing devices in complex terrain. This webinar presented and compared correction techniques from several suppliers (Leosphere, WindSim, Meteodyn) when applied to data collected by the most prominent sensing devices (Triton, WindCube, ZX). All techniques show similar results: uncorrected RSD wind speeds differ from cup measurement by 2%-5% and corrected data are all within ±1%. This study also examines anemometer biases due to flow inclination. The webinar goes beyond the CFARS presentation to AWEA 2020, providing further detail on the datasets, terrain classification and methods used to compare mast and lidars. Andrew Hastings Black, Scott Wylie, and Paul Mazoyer presented the survey results. The discussion was moderated by Andy Clifton from IEA Wind Task 32. This repository includes the following files: An introduction by Task 32 ("2020 12 08...") The main presentation ("CFARS_...").
This material was presented in an IEA Wind Task 32 webinar on 8 December 2020. For more information about IEA Wind Task 32 see https://community.ieawind.org/task32/home. For more information about CFARS see http://www.cfars.org/.
complex terrain, wind lidar, complex flow, wind energy, resource assessment
complex terrain, wind lidar, complex flow, wind energy, resource assessment
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 95 | |
| downloads | 80 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts