Views provided by UsageCounts
Data was simulated according to an Emax model (scenarios 1 and 2) or a Hill model (scenarios 3 and 4) with a rich (scenarios 1 and 3) and a sparse design (scenarios 2 and 4). The archive contains 4 folders with the data simulated in the first 4 scenarios (N=200 simulated datasets in each folder): - scenario 1 - pdemax.rich - scenario 2 - pdemax.sparse - scenario 3 - pdhillhigh.rich - scenario 4 - pdhillhigh.sparse The data used in scenarios 5 and 6 was a subset of the datasets simulated in scenarios 3 and 4 respectively. In scenario 5, 20 subjects were taken from each dataset (subjects 1-5, 26-30, 51-55, 76-80) from the datasets in folder pdhillhigh.rich. In scenario 6, the datasets were constituted by the first 20 subjects from each sampling group of the data simulated in pdhillhigh.sparse.
saemix, Emax model, non-linear mixed effect models, bootstrap
saemix, Emax model, non-linear mixed effect models, bootstrap
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 6 |

Views provided by UsageCounts