Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Advances in computer technology is now proven to have changed the life style of working, so that workers do not sit in place but it can do the work anywhere and anytime, because computer technology support to be able to work in mobile. As a worker with high mobility, of course, need a tool such as atablet or a notebook, to be able to help handle any job. The main concern of the workers is to choose a notebook that suits their needs and tailored to the devices required in accordance with the Notebook function, because it affects the cost to be incurred in the purchase of products according to their needs. To help overcome this problem, then there is one solution that can serve as solutions that make up the academic hierarchy model is used to solve the problem of qualitative and quantitative Analytic Hierarchical Process (AHP) with Multi-Criteria Decision Making approach through Matrix Algebra, while supporting applications to prove results of mathematical analysis is the application of Expert Choice. With both this measure, we can compare the results of calculations obtained by application of Expert Choice mathematically, especially to prove the value of the resulting eigenvector both mathematically and with the Expert Choice application gives the same value. Testing the consistency of the Consistency Ratio (CR) gives an acceptable value according to the rules Saaty should be less than 0.1. For the final selection of the value notebook synthesize generate sequential priority values as follows 0.299 for Acer Espire 3820T, 0.273 for Lenovo Centre Think Edge, 0.224 for Asus K42JC, and 0.207 for HP Probook 4430S.
Notebook Selection, Matrix Algebra,Multi-Criteria Decision Making, Expert Choice.
Notebook Selection, Matrix Algebra,Multi-Criteria Decision Making, Expert Choice.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 2 | |
| downloads | 5 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts