
We introduce the Controlled Perturbation Algorithm (CPA) for escaping saddle points in generic deterministic non‑convex optimization problems. CPA requires only 2 gradient computations per iteration, incurring a cost of O(d) where dd is the number of degrees of freedom. Its key idea is elegant: for each coordinate, two adaptive perturbations are applied, their directional derivatives are evaluated, and a descent direction is selected deterministically—all without computing second‑ or higher‑order derivatives. Additionally, we define the Non‑Descent Direction Approximation (NDDA) index, a computationally cheap heuristic that indicates proximity to a local minimum. Since Version 1.1 of this preprint, building on CPA, we present its extension—the 3‑Gradient‑Probe Controlled Perturbation Algorithm (3GCPA)—which is designed for both deterministic and probabilistic optimization problems (e.g., machine learning and neural networks). 3GCPA uses 3 gradient computations per iteration, still O(d), thereby preserving linear scalability. By merging gradient‑based optimization with a finite‑element‑like probing strategy, 3GCPA effectively overcomes the challenges posed by stochasticity in probabilistic models, offering robust performance where pure CPA may struggle. This note is a preliminary algorithmic description intended to establish priority. The algorithms are presented as heuristic tools; rigorous convergence guarantees are left for future work. Some experimental results for deterministic optimization problems are included in Sections 5 and 6 of the following preprint https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20083397 The source code is provided with that preprint. If any errors are discovered, the author would appreciate being notified by email at khcheng920911@gmail.com
Optimization, Machine Learning, Operations Research, Differential Equations, Computer Simulation
Optimization, Machine Learning, Operations Research, Differential Equations, Computer Simulation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
