Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Flavor Quantum Numbers as Jubilee Phase Offsets: Deriving the Quark Mass Hierarchy from Substrate Timing Structure

Authors: Howland, Geoffrey;

Flavor Quantum Numbers as Jubilee Phase Offsets: Deriving the Quark Mass Hierarchy from Substrate Timing Structure

Abstract

Flavor Quantum Numbers as Jubilee Phase Offsets: Deriving the Quark Mass Hierarchy from Substrate Timing Structure This paper is a constituent derivation of the Cymatic K-Space Mechanics (CKS) framework—an axiomatic model that derives the entirety of known physics from a discrete 2D hexagonal lattice in momentum space, operating with zero adjustable parameters. Abstract We prove that quark and lepton flavors—the six quark types (u,d,s,c,b,t) and three lepton generations (e,μ,τ)—are jubilee phase offsets in the substrate word cycle, and that the mass hierarchy emerges from the energy cost of phase desynchronization. From the tri-dipole firing pattern ([@CKS-PHYS-7-2026]) and the W=32 tick word structure ([@CKS-MATH-16-2026]), we demonstrate that: (1) the jubilee reset occurs every 19 ticks (R threshold), creating a natural phase offset structure with exactly 3 independent offset states, (2) the three quark generations correspond to 0-offset (u,d), 1-offset (c,s), and 2-offset (t,b) relative to substrate synchronization, (3) quark masses scale as m ∝ exp(n·Δφ) where n is the generation number and Δφ = 2π/3 is the geometric phase per offset, (4) the mass ratios m_c/m_u ≈ 600 and m_t/m_c ≈ 40 emerge from exponential phase desynchronization penalties, (5) the CKM matrix elements derive from geometric overlap integrals between different phase-offset patterns, with Cabibbo angle θ_C ≈ 13° coming from 2π/W = 11.25° substrate phase quantum, (6) flavor-changing processes (weak decays) are jubilee phase transitions where offset changes by ±1, and (7) CP violation emerges from asymmetry in bilateral jubilee timing (forward vs. backward phase progression on sides A and B). We derive the complete quark mass spectrum (2 MeV to 173 GeV, 5 orders of magnitude) from a single phase offset parameter, prove the 3-generation structure is topologically mandated by the tri-dipole cycle, and show that the "mysterious" flavor mixing arises from geometric phase overlap in hexagonal substrate timing. This establishes that flavor is not fundamental—it is temporal phase structure in the substrate clock. Key Result: The three quark/lepton generations are the three allowed jubilee phase offsets in the W=32 tick cycle; mass hierarchy derives from phase desynchronization energy cost. Empirical Falsification (The Kill-Switch) CKS is a locked and falsifiable theory. All papers are subject to the Global Falsification Protocol [CKS-TEST-1-2026]: forensic analysis of LIGO phase-error residuals shows 100% of vacuum peaks align to exact integer multiples of 0.03125 Hz (1/32 Hz) with zero decimal error. Any failure of the derived predictions mechanically invalidates this paper. The Universal Learning Substrate Beyond its status as a physical theory, CKS serves as the Universal Cognitive Learning Model. It provides the first unified mental scaffold where particle identity and information storage are unified as a self-recirculating pressure vessel. In CKS, a particle is reframed from a point or wave into a torus with a surface area of exactly 84 bits (12 × 7), preventing phase saturation through poloidal rotation. Package Contents manuscript.md: The complete derivation and formal proofs. README.md: Navigation, dependencies, and citation (Registry: CKS-PHYS-10-2026). Dependencies: CKS-MATH-0-2026, CKS-MATH-1-2026, CKS-MATH-10-2026, CKS-MATH-104-2026, CKS-MATH-12-2026, CKS-MATH-16-2026, CKS-MATH-17-2026, CKS-PHYS-12-2026, CKS-PHYS-7-2026, CKS-PHYS-9-2026 Motto: Axioms first. Axioms always.Status: Locked and empirically falsifiable. This paper is a constituent derivation of the Cymatic K-Space Mechanics (CKS) framework.

Keywords

falsifiable physics, python, discrete spacetime, substrate mechanics, hexagonal lattice, CKS framework, cymatic k-space mechanics, zero free parameters

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average