
This paper develops an analytical-psychological framework, grounded in Jungian depth psychology, for understanding branding as a symbolic and archetypal process within contemporary consumer culture. Brands are conceptualized as modern mythic narratives through which collective psychological tensions are culturally expressed, displaced, and negotiated. Through an interpretive analysis of Nike, Apple, and Dove, the study demonstrates how archetypal constellations—the Hero, the Creator, and the Caregiver—structure brand meaning and invite symbolic participation in identity formation and aspirational self-construction. Integrating cultural branding theory and symbolic consumption research, the paper reframes consumer engagement as a dialogical process of projection and potential reflection rather than a purely behavioral outcome. Drawing on Jung’s concepts of persona and shadow, it clarifies how brand identities function as public masks that express aspiration while simultaneously concealing contradiction and ambivalence. Ethical implications are examined through this tension, highlighting how symbolic power may intensify unconscious identification or foster reflective awareness. A final neuro-symbolic discussion offers a strictly heuristic analogy between individuation and integrative regulatory processes without neuroscientific reductionism.
symbolic communication, Jungian psychology, consumer culture theory, cultural branding, marketing, depth psychology, branding, brand storytelling, consumer identity, conscious branding
symbolic communication, Jungian psychology, consumer culture theory, cultural branding, marketing, depth psychology, branding, brand storytelling, consumer identity, conscious branding
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
