Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

A CRITICAL ANALYSIS ON THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE (AUDIO AND VIDEO RECORDING OF INTERVIEWS WITH SUSPECTS) RULES G.N 792/2023.

Authors: Moza M chamani;

A CRITICAL ANALYSIS ON THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE (AUDIO AND VIDEO RECORDING OF INTERVIEWS WITH SUSPECTS) RULES G.N 792/2023.

Abstract

This article makes a critical analysis on the Criminal Procedure (Audio and Video Recording of Interviews with Suspects) Rules GN NO.792 of 2023 which marked a significance step toward modernizing Tanzania’s criminal justice system and aligning pre-trial procedures with constitutional and international fair trial standards. These Rules aim to enhance transparency, accountability and integrity in criminal investigation by mandating the use of audio and video recordings during suspect interviews at the police station. However, while the Rules represent a commendable reform effort, this dissertation critically examines their structural, procedural and practical weaknesses that potentially undermine their intended objectives and the broader right of a fair trial as guaranteed under Article 13(6) (a) of the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania of 1977and international human rights instruments such as ICCPR and the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights. The analysis identifies several challenges of the Rules including discretionary nature of recording requirement, which require law enforcement officers to bypass recording without clear, stringent justification.

Keywords

A suspect, police interview, compelled confension, and criminal justice system.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!