Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Teacher Perceptions of the Use of Generative AI Tools in ESL Classrooms: A Review of Studies

Authors: Sankaja, Amaraweera; Dr. Lishanthi, Wijewardhene;

Teacher Perceptions of the Use of Generative AI Tools in ESL Classrooms: A Review of Studies

Abstract

The integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools in English as a Second Language(ESL) classrooms has gained increasing attention in recent years. While these tools offer numerous advantages,such as personalized learning, automated feedback, and enhanced student engagement, their effectiveness largelydepends on teachers' perceptions and willingness to integrate them into their teaching practices. This literaturereview examines existing research on teacher perceptions of GenAI in ESL classrooms, focusing on both thepotential benefits and the challenges associated with its implementation. The review explores themes such aspedagogical applications, teacher attitudes, technological barriers, and ethical concerns. Findings suggest thatwhile many educators recognize the potential of GenAI for improving instructional efficiency and studentautonomy, concerns related to accuracy, digital literacy, and the risk of over-reliance on AI-generated contentpersist. Additionally, a lack of institutional support and teacher training remains a significant barrier towidespread adoption. The review highlights gaps in current research, particularly in non-Western ESL contexts,and emphasizes the need for further studies on professional development programmes and long-term impacts ofthe integration of GenAI in language learning.

Keywords

English as a Second Language (ESL), Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI), ChatGPT, Technology Enhanced Language Learning (TELL), Mobile Assisted Language Learning (MALL), Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL)

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green