
This deliverable (D3.2) synthesizes comprehensive research on science journalism theoretical framework and on fellowship programs to establish evidence-based best practices for ethically sound program design and implementation. Disclaimer: Funded by the European Union (EU) through the European Research Council (ERC) grant FRONTIERS, nr 101121863. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the EU or the ERC Executive Agency. Neither the EU nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them. The subgrants are not given by the EU or the ERC. This deliverable has not yet been approved by the European Commission.
Best Practices, Science Journalism, Fellowships, Frontier Science
Best Practices, Science Journalism, Fellowships, Frontier Science
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
