Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

D1.4 Draft book chapter for the LEGITIMULT edited volume

Authors: Schakel, Arjan Hille; Verdoes, Alexander;

D1.4 Draft book chapter for the LEGITIMULT edited volume

Abstract

The Covid-19 crisis provides for a unique opportunity to empirically test a commonly held assumption in the literature that crises centralize and concentrate authority in national governments. The Subnational Government Epidemic Authority Index (SGEAI) traces self-rule and shared rule in relation to restrictive and preventive measures before and during the Covid-19 crisis in 27 European countries. The SGEAI reveals that no significant centralization has taken place in relation to shared rule and preventive measures, but subnational governments lost self-rule in countries that did have pre-crisis epidemic competences whereas they gained self-rule in countries that did not have epidemic competences. These strikingly contrasting results can be explained by the regulatory nature of restrictive measures which require limited decentralization for monitoring and sanctioning compliance to restrictions. In addition, the benefits of decentralization could also be achieved by territorial differentiation–i.e. adjusting restrictions to locally differing infection rates and public health care capacities—or RTV-differentiation –i.e. adjusting restrictions to people who pose a lower risk for further spreading an infectious disease because they were recovered (R), tested negative (T), or were vaccinated (V).

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!