Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

D4.9 2nd Report of the Ethics Advisory Board

Authors: Lea, Nathan; de zegher, isabelle; Kalra, Dipak;

D4.9 2nd Report of the Ethics Advisory Board

Abstract

This Deliverable D4.9 provides the second report of AIDAVA’s Ethics Advisory Board of Independent Experts (EAB). It summarises the main activities of the EAB and provides details of current and next steps in ethics oversight of AIDAVA throughout 2024 and 2025.Throughout 2024 and 2025 the EAB had provided advisory on the implementation of G1 and planning for G2. For G1 the EAB attended an in person Workshop in Maastricht with Patient Consultants to prepare for evaluations throughout Summer 2024. The EAB also provided input on the results presented in the G1 Report.For G2 the EAB liaised closely with the Patient Advisory Board and Sustainability Board, providing input to the Consent Forms, Study Information Packages as well as amendments to the ethics approvals for G1 to support Developer Access to raw data for their implementation and validation work.The EAB advice remains focused on ensuring that the participant’s voice is heard clearly and that due consideration is given to their experience and feedback in participating in AIDAVA. They have explored other areas of relevance, including the role of synthetic data in testing and validation and with a wider view of the implications of newer regulations (including the AI Act and EHDS) on AIDAVA.As the project approaches the last year of its operation the EAB will focus on ethics issues associated with the execution of G2 and future plans for AIDAVA, particularly on the patient experience and user-friendliness of the App. They will continue to work closely with the Patient and Sustainability Advisory Boards. The EAB will continue to balance the advisory scope of their intervention role with the unique and hands-on approach they have taken in engaging with the project, its development and regulatory teams, fellow Advisory Boards and the Patient Consultants.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Ethics, Oversight, Risk management, Accountability, Regulatory compliance, Transparency

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average