This contribution solves the problem of assessing urban violence as a phenomenon, an appropriate assessing problem for cities that put social stability and safety in the balance for the urban fabric. The contribution's topicality involves social realities and social welfare from which assessment and application opportunities require new endeavors. Although the literature cites many factors responsible for urban crimes from the inequalities and criminology point of view, no one source positions an all-inclusive geographical based framework to date that embraces plurality of perspective and uncertainty generated from social systems. Therefore, neutrosophilic multiperspectivism is the selected solution whereby multineutropic sets and a similarity function establish a representation and assessment of differing points of view based on relative truth, indeterminacy, and falsity. Thereafter, the study assessed for violence compares the results of incidents from the geographical perspective to the socio perspective to identify patterns of successful polarization that exist when no one talks about them yet determined. Suggestions advocate champions and partnership for social change. Results indicate the framework is applicable for industrial use to assess uncertainty in complicated systems with the appropriate amount of flexibility. Ultimately, this work contributes a formalized framework which renders assessments with the potential to go beyond simple true-false perspectives so that inclusive policy integration and sustainable efforts can emerge for greater coexistence supported by multidimensional assessments of urban violence.