The precise isotropy of the CMB monopole's redshift, despite the highly anisotropic matter distribution in our observable universe, presents an unresolved crisis in precision cosmology. A conservative estimate based on standard perturbation theory and the central limit theorem predicts redshift anisotropies at the $\delta z/z\gtrsim1\%$ level—large enough to overwhelm the primordial CMB anisotropies and even the dipole. That no such effect is observed is not merely a fine-tuning issue; it is an empirical failure of GR-based reasoning, which overlooked an effect that, had it been considered, would have led to a falsified prediction. The absence of this expected redshift contrast requires an unexplained suppression of more than three orders of magnitude, demanding a theoretical resolution. Cosmological Relativity (CR) provides a natural resolution to this isotropy problem, as well as to several long-standing epistemic failures of operational relativity revealed by modern cosmology. CR is a geometric augmentation of GR that retains its exact empirical success in local space-time while resolving fundamental cosmological tensions. Unlike a mere conceptual reinterpretation, CR introduces new mathematical structure—a preferred foliation with absolute cosmic time and diffeomorphic flexibility between real space and cosmological space-time slices—allowing it to accommodate observed isotropy while preserving local covariance. This distinct geometric framework leads to new predictions for emergent features of our universe, including the nature of black holes and the phenomenological flat $\Lambda$CDM expansion rate derived from first principles. By resolving the core epistemic problems of FLRW (GR+RW) cosmology—along with paradoxes related to time travel and black holes—CR offers a more complete foundation for modern physics while remaining fully consistent with established observational constraints. It also provides a clear empirical prediction with the potential to resolve the Hubble tension. CR follows the historically established progression of scientific theory, in which phenomenological descriptions evolve to distinguish observed phenomena from underlying physical reality once fundamental inconsistencies in naive and superficial interpretations have been identified.