
Hedging Our Bet on Forest Permanence for the Economic Viability of Climate Targets – Model Output and Results Contact: michael.windisch@env.ethz.ch Contents This repository contains model output from the REMIND and/or MAgPIE models used in the assessment for the manuscript"Hedging Our Bet on Forest Permanence for the Economic Viability of Climate Targets". The data is provided in Model Intercomparison Format (.mif) and includes the following attributes: Model Scenario Region Variable Unit Period Value .mif Files The .mif (Model Intercomparison Format) is a structured text format. The files in this repository are semicolon-separated (CSV-like), with headers defining key attributes. They can be processed using any software that supports delimited text, including R and Python. For IAM-specific analysis, tailored packages like quitte (https://github.com/pik-piam/quitte) in R provide convenient tools for handling .mif files. Data Structure The model output is organized into folders based on experimental setups, as follows: Control Runs (control) – Simulations without forest carbon loss. 1.5°C and 2°C Experiments (1.5degC, 2degC) – Scenarios meeting climate targets despite forest carbon loss, with disturbance rates of: 0.2% (FCL-002) 0.4% (FCL-004) 0.8% (FCL-008) 1.6% (FCL-016) Sensitivity Experiments (sensitivity), further divided into: GCM – Varying Global Circulation Model (GCM) inputs SSP – Varying Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP) assumptions File Naming Convention Each file follows the naming pattern: {ssp}-{climate goal}-FCL-{response type}-{response time}-{gcm}.mif Control scenarios only include {ssp} and {climate goal} since they do not experience forest carbon loss or a response to it. Sensitivity analyses include variations in {gcm}.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
