Views provided by UsageCounts
The Comparative Independent Fiscal Institution Dataset (CifiD) provides information about the legal provisions that constitute the monitoring scope, powers and institutional design of 41 Independent Fiscal Institutions (IFIs) in 38 countries including most EU member states. The dataset covers legislative changes to these institutions until 2018. Furthermore, based on the coding new indices on the political independence and the level of expertise of these fiscal monitoring bodies were developed, allowing researchers to investigate the roots and effectiveness of fiscal monitoring and its effects on the fiscal performance of national governments more thoroughly. Institutional properties The CifiD contains 42 items that refer to the institutional properties of fiscal monitoring bodies as they are defined in legislation, classified along the following dimensions: Institutional model, monitoring and intervention powers IFI design: statutory rules, operations, leadership, composition, term rules, knowledge, transparency Two main indices were calculated and are part of the dataset: Formal independence from political interference Level of expertise
Fiscal Councils, Institutional Choice, Economic Advice, Public Policy, Independent Fiscal Institutions, Formal Independence, Institutions, Political Economy, Fiscal Monitoring, Fiscal Rules, Fiscal Governance, Public Finance, Budget, Advisors, Fiscal Delegation, Experts
Fiscal Councils, Institutional Choice, Economic Advice, Public Policy, Independent Fiscal Institutions, Formal Independence, Institutions, Political Economy, Fiscal Monitoring, Fiscal Rules, Fiscal Governance, Public Finance, Budget, Advisors, Fiscal Delegation, Experts
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 2 |

Views provided by UsageCounts