Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 1982
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 1982
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 1982
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Species composition, habitat preference and relative occurrence of Chiroptera populations in South Gujarat with comparison of two major biomes.

Authors: Advani, Ranjan;

Species composition, habitat preference and relative occurrence of Chiroptera populations in South Gujarat with comparison of two major biomes.

Abstract

(Uploaded by Plazi for the Bat Literature Project) Species composition, habitat preference and relative occurrence of Chiroptera populations in South Gujarat with comparison of two major biomes. Ecological investigations were carried out on species composition, habitat preference, relative percent occurrence and interrelationship of bat populations with insects and fruit crops in South Gujarat. 286 bats were collected from several localities in eight districts and later grouped under three mam habitats of their occurrence: rocky, forest and human settlement habitat. The insect fauna in a particular habitat was evaluated by trapping and examination of stomach contents of captured bats. 13 species of bats (3 fruit eating, 10 insectivorous) belonging to two suborders and six families were collected in varied relative percentage. Vespertiliomdae among families and Rhinopoma microphyllum kinnean and Pipistrellus dormeri among species were predominant groups in South Gujarat. Cynopterus sphinx and Taphozous melanopogon roosted exclusively in the forest habitat, while Rhinopoma. hardwickei and Hipposideros speons were found only in rocky habitat. Four species, Ronsettus leschenaulti (a fruit eating bat), Taphozous kachhensis, T. longimanus and Pipistrellus dormeri were found in all three main habitats. The remaining five species occurred in various combinations of two habitats in varying relative densities. There was a direct relationship between diversificationand composition of insect fauna and bat species composition in all three main habitats. Distribution of fruit tree plants determined distribution of three fruit bat species. A comparison was made between northern districts' biome (low rainfall, greater temperature fluctuations, lesser wind speed and dry deciduous forest) and southern districts' biome (high rainfall, deciduous forest) both separated by two rivers. Both biomes shared ten species. However, R. hardwickei, P. mimus and H. speoris occurred exclusively in the northern while C. sphinx, Megaderma lyra and T. melanopogon were found only in the southern biome of South Gujarat. Relative percent occurrence of Pteropus giganteus, R. leschenaulti, R. m. kinnean, T, kachhensis and Scotophilus heathi reduced, whereas that of 7". longimanus and P. dormeri increased from north to south. This distribution pattern of bats has been discussed in the light of morphological, ecological and behavioural adaptations.

Keywords

Chiroptera, Mammalia, bats, Animalia, bat, Biodiversity, Chordata

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities