Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Ophthalmic Manifestation of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) In a Tertiary Care Center, Patna, Bihar, India

Authors: Archana; Raj Nath Singh; Vijay Kumar;

Ophthalmic Manifestation of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) In a Tertiary Care Center, Patna, Bihar, India

Abstract

Objectives: The present study was to evaluate and compared the Ophthalmic manifestations of patients between methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) in a tertiary care center, Patna, Bihar, India. Methods: We determined susceptibility of the isolates to seven antibiotics (oxacillin, penicillin, erythromycin, clindamycin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, vancomycin and teicoplanin) using the disc diffusion method according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. We used oxacillin to test for b-lactam antibiotic resistance. We reviewed patient charts to collect demographic and clinical information. Results: Health exposure for ocular infection in MRSA patients was 11(36.66%) and in MSSA was 8(22.85%). It was not significant differences (p=0.22). Clinical Diagnoses Associated with Ocular MRSA and MSSA ocular had Keratitis 12(40%) and 15(42.85%) respectively, which was not significant differences (p=0.817). Conjunctivitis, lacrimal system disorder, wound infection, endophthalmitis, vision threatening disorder and others in MRSA and MSSA patients was not significant differences (p>0.05). But the lid disorder in MRSA and MSSA patients was significant differences (p=0.033). Erythromycin and clindamycin in MRSA and MSSA patient were highly significant differences (p=<0.0001). Penicillin and Sulfamethoxazole/Trimethoprim in MRSA and MSSA was significantly differences (p=0.057). MRSA was significantly more resistant than MSSA to several antibiotics including erythromycin, clindamycin, penicillin and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim. 83.33% of MRSA isolates were susceptible to sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim. Conclusions: All MRSA isolates are susceptible to vancomycin and teicoplanin. MRSA is common in ocular Staphylococcus aureus infection in our tertiary care centre. Hence, Infectious diseases may differ by regions in epidemiologic patterns, spectrum and severity of disease, and profiles of antibiotic susceptibility.

Objectives: The present study was to evaluate and compared the Ophthalmic manifestations of patients between methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) in a tertiary care center, Patna, Bihar, India. Methods: We determined susceptibility of the isolates to seven antibiotics (oxacillin, penicillin, erythromycin, clindamycin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, vancomycin and teicoplanin) using the disc diffusion method according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. We used oxacillin to test for b-lactam antibiotic resistance. We reviewed patient charts to collect demographic and clinical information. Results: Health exposure for ocular infection in MRSA patients was 11(36.66%) and in MSSA was 8(22.85%). It was not significant differences (p=0.22). Clinical Diagnoses Associated with Ocular MRSA and MSSA ocular had Keratitis 12(40%) and 15(42.85%) respectively, which was not significant differences (p=0.817). Conjunctivitis, lacrimal system disorder, wound infection, endophthalmitis, vision threatening disorder and others in MRSA and MSSA patients was not significant differences (p>0.05). But the lid disorder in MRSA and MSSA patients was significant differences (p=0.033). Erythromycin and clindamycin in MRSA and MSSA patient were highly significant differences (p=<0.0001). Penicillin and Sulfamethoxazole/Trimethoprim in MRSA and MSSA was significantly differences (p=0.057). MRSA was significantly more resistant than MSSA to several antibiotics including erythromycin, clindamycin, penicillin and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim. 83.33% of MRSA isolates were susceptible to sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim. Conclusions: All MRSA isolates are susceptible to vancomycin and teicoplanin. MRSA is common in ocular Staphylococcus aureus infection in our tertiary care centre. Hence, Infectious diseases may differ by regions in epidemiologic patterns, spectrum and severity of disease, and profiles of antibiotic susceptibility.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Ophthalmic manifestation, MRSA, MSSA

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities