Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Report . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Report . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

User Research: UK Gallery, Library, Archive and Museum (GLAM) Digital Collections Infrastructure

Authors: Bailey-Ross, Claire; Burgess, Emily; Papageorgiou, Panagiotis;

User Research: UK Gallery, Library, Archive and Museum (GLAM) Digital Collections Infrastructure

Abstract

This report was commissioned by the Towards a National Collection (TaNC) Programme Directorate, to conduct a user consultation to identify researchers' needs and requirements, helping to define what should be included in a future UK digital collections infrastructure. This research was part of the TaNC programme, which aims to open up and democratise access to cultural heritage collections across the UK. The main aim of the consultation was to gain a comprehensive understanding of the needs and requirements of different research users across academia and Independent Research Organisations (IROs), and what they would like to see included in a future UK digital collections infrastructure. The consultation comprised three stages: Initial liaison with TaNC-funded projects and consultants gathered strategic insights, framing the user consultation approach. A mixed-method consultation, including focus groups, interviews, and a survey, to understand digital infrastructure needs across various research fields and career stages. Critical analysis of the collected data revealed user requirements, motivations, career levels, and behaviours. Insights were shared and refined with key stakeholders. This approach was designed to gain a nuanced understanding of user perspectives, informing the development of a tailored and effective UK digital collections infrastructure.

Keywords

FOS: Computer and information sciences, Humanities, Computer and information sciences, Library sciences, FOS: Humanities, Digital humanities

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average