Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Report . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Report . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Kooperative Resilienz: Ein Leitfaden für Städte und Kommunen zur Bürgerbeteiligung im Katastrophenschutz

Cooperative Resilience: A Guide for Cities and Local Authorities on Citizen Participation in Disaster Management
Authors: Knodt, Michele; Engel, Alice; Petersen, Sonja; Kluge, Marie; Quittkat, Christine; Linke, Hans-Joachim;

Kooperative Resilienz: Ein Leitfaden für Städte und Kommunen zur Bürgerbeteiligung im Katastrophenschutz

Abstract

Zusammenfassung: Das städtische Katastrophenschutzmanagement erfordert die Zusammenarbeit von Behörden, Organisationen mit Sicherheitsaufgaben, privaten Unternehmen und Bürger:innen. Der erfolgreiche Umgang mit Katastrophen setzt die frühzeitige Einbindung und (geübte) regelmäßige Kooperation aller beteiligten Parteien voraus. Partizipation spielt dabei eine zentrale Rolle, da sie die Qualität und Akzeptanz von Entscheidungen erhöht: Sie verbessert Entscheidungsprozesse, baut Vertrauen auf und stärkt informelle Netzwerke. Die Partizipationsstufen reichen von informativen Maßnahmen bis zur gemeinsamen Lösungserarbeitung. Der idealtypische Ablauf eines kooperativen Partizipationsprozesses zur Entwicklung eines Krisenmanagementplans umfasst: die Klärung der Zielgruppe, das Einholen von Meinungen und Präferenzen der Bürger und Stakeholder, die Entwicklung von Optionen in Workshops zur Diskussion und Definition von Lösungen, die Rückmeldung der Ergebnisse an die Teilnehmer und die aktive Integration der Ergebnisse des Partizipationsprozesses in die politischen Entscheidungsprozesse. Ko-Kreation-Prozesse sind entscheidend, um die Resilienz von Städten zu stärken und komplexe Krisen zu bewältigen, indem sie die Qualität und Akzeptanz von Entscheidungen verbessern. Schlagworte: Katastrophenschutz, Resilienz, Partizipation, Stakeholder, Krisenbewältigung Abstract: Urban disaster management requires the cooperation of public authorities, security organisations, private companies and citizens. Successful disaster management requires the early involvement and (practised) regular cooperation of all stakeholders. Participation plays a central role in this, as it increases the quality and acceptance of decisions: it improves decision-making processes, builds trust and strengthens informal networks. The levels of participation range from information to joint development of solutions. The ideal-typical sequence of a cooperative participation process for the development of a crisis management plan includes: clarifying the target group, obtaining the opinions and preferences of citizens and stakeholders, developing options in workshops to discuss and define solutions, providing feedback on the results to participants, and actively integrating the results of the participation process into the political decision-making processes. Co-creation processes are essential for enhancing urban resilience and managing complex crises, as they improve the quality and acceptance of decisions.Keywords: Disaster prevention, Resilience, Participation, Stakeholders, Crisis management *This Policy Paper is part of the emergenCITY Policy Paper Series and has been funded by the LOEWE initiative (Hesse, Germany) within the emergenCITY center [LOEWE/1/12/519/03/05.001(0016)/72]. emergenCITY Policy Papers represent the personal views of the authors and not necessarily the views of the emergenCITY centre or its staff.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?