<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

Investigation of metadata standard use by geoscience data repositories

Name: Investigation of metadata standard use by geoscience data repositories
Keywords: EARTH SCIENCE SERVICES > DATA MANAGEMENT/DATA HANDLING > DATA INTEROPERABILITY

Research datakeyboard_double_arrow_right Dataset 01 Jan 2021Publisher:UCAR/NCAR - GDEX

Authors: Liapich, Yauheniya; Mayernik, Matthew;

doi: 10.5065/z9ch-wk24

Investigation of metadata standard use by geoscience data repositories

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

This dataset supports a paper being written about metadata standard use by geoscience data repositories. The study is being done to better understand which metadata standards and keyword vocabularies are prominent within the geoscience data repository landscape. The findings should be useful for NCAR's evaluation of metadata standards within our own systems, as well as by external data repository staff. The guiding questions of the study are as follows: 1. What metadata standards are geoscience data repositories using? 2. What keyword / subject term vocabularies are they using? 3. What interoperability challenges are present in the use of metadata and keyword vocabulary standards within the geoscience repository community?

Related Organizations

University Corporation for Atmospheric Research
United States
University of Denver
United States

Keywords

EARTH SCIENCE SERVICES > DATA MANAGEMENT/DATA HANDLING > DATA INTEROPERABILITY

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	0
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average

Found an issue? Give us feedback

Average