
handle: 11583/2995164
The paper presents a preliminary study limited to the use of wave height for the data corresponding to the Gulf of Biscay, a location with a very dominant North-West wave rose. It benchmarks different bias correction (BC) techniques and evaluates their performance, as well as the sensitivity of the BC to the reference dataset employed for the identification of the BC parameters. More precisely, the amount of data (number of years) and the selected period (exact years) are analysed. Overall, the results demonstrate that the Gumbel-based BC techniques overperform the linearly-spaced BC techniques, the directional-adjusted Gumbel Quantile Mapping technique showing the lowest bias. With respect to the sensitivity of the reference data, BC seems to provide satisfactory results even when only 1 year of data are used. However, the dispersion among the different selected periods is large, resulting in large uncertainties. This dispersion reduces significantly once 3 or more years of data are used, independently of the selected period.
Resource assessment; Bias Correction; Quantile Mapping; Sensitivity Analysis
Resource assessment; Bias Correction; Quantile Mapping; Sensitivity Analysis
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
