Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.1063/5.0019773
pmid: 32933271
handle: 2445/173616 , 11588/842598 , 10197/12576 , 11583/2845679 , 11696/82666 , 1887/137046
doi: 10.1063/5.0019773
pmid: 32933271
handle: 2445/173616 , 11588/842598 , 10197/12576 , 11583/2845679 , 11696/82666 , 1887/137046
In this perspective communication, we briefly sketch the current state of computational (bio)material research and discuss possible solutions for the four challenges that have been increasingly identified within this community: (i) the desire to develop a unified framework for testing the consistency of implementation and physical accuracy for newly developed methodologies, (ii) the selection of a standard format that can deal with the diversity of simulation data and at the same time simplifies data storage, data exchange, and data reproduction, (iii) how to deal with the generation, storage, and analysis of massive data, and (iv) the benefits of efficient “core” engines. Expressed viewpoints are the result of discussions between computational stakeholders during a Lorentz center workshop with the prosaic title Workshop on Multi-scale Modeling and are aimed at (i) improving validation, reporting and reproducibility of computational results, (ii) improving data migration between simulation packages and with analysis tools, (iii) popularizing the use of coarse-grained and multi-scale computational tools among non-experts and opening up these modern computational developments to an extended user community.
modelling, (bio)materials, Aprenentatge automàtic, Machine learning, General Physics and Astronomy, Dinàmica molecular, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Molecular dynamics, Coarse-grained computational models
modelling, (bio)materials, Aprenentatge automàtic, Machine learning, General Physics and Astronomy, Dinàmica molecular, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Molecular dynamics, Coarse-grained computational models
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 50 | |
| downloads | 85 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts