publication . Preprint . 2017

Performance tradeoffs of dynamically controlled grid-connected inverters in low inertia power systems

Jiang, Yan; Pates, Richard; Mallada, Enrique;
Open Access English
  • Published: 01 May 2017
Implementing frequency response using grid-connected inverters is one of the popular proposed alternatives to mitigate the dynamic degradation experienced in low inertia power systems. However, such solution faces several challenges as inverters do not intrinsically possess the natural response to power fluctuations that synchronous generators have. Thus, to synthetically generate this response, inverters need to take frequency measurements, which are usually noisy, and subsequently make changes in the output power, which are therefore delayed. This paper explores the system-wide performance tradeoffs that arise when measurement noise, power disturbances, and de...
free text keywords: Computer Science - Systems and Control, Mathematics - Optimization and Control
Related Organizations
19 references, page 1 of 2

[1] M. Milligan, B. Frew, B. Kirby, M. Schuerger, K. Clark, D. Lew, P. Denholm, B. Zavadil, M. O'Malley, and B. Tsuchida, “Alternatives No More Wind and Solar Power Are Mainstays of a Clean, Reliable, Affordable Grid,” IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 78-87, 2015.

[2] W. Winter, K. Elkington, and G. Bareux, “Pushing the Limits: Europe's New Grid: Innovative Tools to Combat Transmission Bottlenecks and Reduced Inertia,” IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, 2015. [OpenAIRE]

[3] North American Electric Reliability Corporation, “Eastern Interconnection Frequency Initiative Whitepaper,” Dec. 2013.

[4] A. J. Wood, B. F. Wollenberg, and G. B. Sheble, “Power generation, operation and control,” John Wiley&Sons, 1996.

[5] J. Boemer, K. Burges, C. Nabe, and M. Po¨ller, All Island TSO Facilitation of Renewables Studies. EirGrid and SONI, 2010.

[6] B. J. Kirby, “Frequency Regulation Basics and Trends,” Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tech. Rep., Jan. 2005.

[7] North American Electric Reliability Corporation, “Frequency Response Initiative Report,” pp. 1-212, Oct. 2012.

[8] Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, “Essential Reliability Services and the Evolving Bulk-Power System-Primary Frequency Response ,” Nov. 2016.

[9] J. Driesen and K. Visscher, “Virtual synchronous generators,” in IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting: Conversion and Delivery of Electrical Energy in the 21st Century, PES. IEEE, New York, United States, Sep. 2008. [OpenAIRE]

[10] E. Mallada, “iDroop: A dynamic droop controller to decouple power grid's steady-state and dynamic performance,” in 55th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), 2016. [OpenAIRE]

[11] F. Paganini, Z. Wang, J. C. Doyle, and S. H. Low, “Congestion control for high performance, stability, and fairness in general networks,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 43-56.

[12] R. Pates and E. Mallada, “Decentralized robust inverterbased control in power systems,” in IFAC World Congress, accepted, iFAC World Congress. [Online]. Available:

[13] M. Ciobotaru, R. Teodorescu, and V. G. Agelidis, “Offset rejection for PLL based synchronization in grid-connected converters,” in Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, 2008. APEC 2008. Twenty-Third Annual IEEE. IEEE, 2008, pp. 1611-1617. [OpenAIRE]

[14] F. Blaabjerg, R. Teodorescu, M. Liserre, and A. V. Timbus, “Overview of Control and Grid Synchronization for Distributed Power Generation Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 1398-1409, 2006. [OpenAIRE]

[15] J. C. Doyle, K. Glover, P. P. Khargonekar, and B. A. Francis, “Statespace solutions to standard H2 and H∞ control problems,” Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 831-847, Aug. 1989.

19 references, page 1 of 2
Powered by OpenAIRE Research Graph
Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue