Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2020
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2020
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

D5.1 Report on Vocabularies for Interoperable Language Resources and Services

Authors: Chiarcos, Christian; Cimiano, Philipp; Bosque-Gil, Julia; Declerck, Thierry; F��th, Christian; Gracia, Jorge; Ionov, Maxim; +6 Authors

D5.1 Report on Vocabularies for Interoperable Language Resources and Services

Abstract

This document provides a survey over vocabularies for language resources and services and sketch necessary extensions and the expected contribution of the Pr��t-��-LLOD project to their further development for phenomena currently not sufficiently covered. Future updates with respect to this will be documented within Task 5.4. We focus on three main aspects of linguistically analyzed data 1. lexical-conceptual resources, i.e., repositories of terminology, lexical data, translation, and semantics, 2. linguistically annotated data, concerning linguistic analysis of textual or transcribed data, and 3. language resource terminology, i.e., linguistic data categories and metadata For these areas, we describe representative vocabularies from the Linguistic Linked Open Data community (RDF-based vocabularies) as well as other approaches (e.g., ISO TC37 standards), we identify a number of gaps, and we describe ongoing efforts to address these gaps within the Pr��t-��-LLOD project.

19 references, page 1 of 2

3.1.2 Linguistic Annotation Structures

3.2 New and Emerging Models and Standards

3.2.1 Current Shortcomings and Desiderata

3.2.2 CoNLL-RDF Tree Extensions

3.2.3 Ontologizing CoNLL-RDF

3.2.4 Technological Bridges between TEI/XML and LOD 4. Linguistic Data Categories and Metadata

4.1 Existing Terminology Repositories and Metadata Specifications

4.1.1 Linguistic Data Categories

ISO TC37 Data Category Registry (ISOCat)

LexInfo 2.0

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 40
    download downloads 33
  • citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    Powered byBIP!BIP!
  • 40
    views
    33
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
40
33
Green
Related to Research communities
Common Language Resources and Technology Infrastructure