Downloads provided by UsageCounts
pmid: 35561167
pmc: PMC9113275
AbstractMotivationSingle-cell sequencing methods provide previously impossible resolution into the transcriptome of individual cells. Cell hashing reduces single-cell sequencing costs by increasing capacity on droplet-based platforms. Cell hashing methods rely on demultiplexing algorithms to accurately classify droplets; however, assumptions underlying these algorithms limit accuracy of demultiplexing, ultimately impacting the quality of single-cell sequencing analyses.ResultsWe present Bimodal Flexible Fitting (BFF) demultiplexing algorithms BFFcluster and BFFraw, a novel class of algorithms that rely on the single inviolable assumption that barcode count distributions are bimodal. We integrated these and other algorithms into cellhashR, a new R package that provides integrated QC and a single command to execute and compare multiple demultiplexing algorithms. We demonstrate that BFFcluster demultiplexing is both tunable and insensitive to issues with poorly behaved data that can confound other algorithms. Using two well-characterized reference datasets, we demonstrate that demultiplexing with BFF algorithms is accurate and consistent for both well-behaved and poorly behaved input data.Availability and implementationcellhashR is available as an R package at https://github.com/BimberLab/cellhashR. cellhashR version 1.0.3 was used for the analyses in this manuscript and is archived on Zenodo at https://www.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6402477.Supplementary informationSupplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Electronic Data Processing, Single-Cell Analysis, Sequence Analysis, Algorithms, Software
Electronic Data Processing, Single-Cell Analysis, Sequence Analysis, Algorithms, Software
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 24 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 6 | |
| downloads | 20 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts