
this study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of current radiographic measurements, which were originally conceived to evaluate adenoid hypertrophy, as potential referral parameters.children aged from 4 to 14 years, of both genders, who presented nasal obstruction complaints, were subjected to cavum radiography. Radiographic examinations (n = 120) were evaluated according to categorical and quantitative parameters, and data were compared to gold-standard videonasopharyngoscopic examination, regarding accuracy (sensitivity, negative predictive value, specificity, and positive predictive value).radiographic grading systems presented low sensitivity for the identification of patients with two-thirds choanal space obstruction. However, some of these parameters presented relatively high specificity rates when three-quarters adenoid obstruction was the threshold of interest. Amongst the quantitative variables, a mathematical model was found to be more suitable for identifying patients with more than two-thirds obstruction.this model was shown to be potentially useful as a screening tool to include patients with, at least, two-thirds adenoid obstruction. Moreover, one of the categorical parameters was demonstrated to be relatively more useful, as well as a potentially safer assessment tool to exclude patients with less than three-quarters obstruction, to be indicated for adenoidectomy.
Male, Adolescent, Diagnóstico, Pediatrics, Sensitivity and Specificity, RJ1-570, Adenoidectomy, Radiography, Adenoidectomia, Child, Preschool, Nasopharynx, Diagnosis, Adenoids, Mouth breathing, Humans, Female, Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health, Nasal Obstruction, Child, Respiração bucal
Male, Adolescent, Diagnóstico, Pediatrics, Sensitivity and Specificity, RJ1-570, Adenoidectomy, Radiography, Adenoidectomia, Child, Preschool, Nasopharynx, Diagnosis, Adenoids, Mouth breathing, Humans, Female, Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health, Nasal Obstruction, Child, Respiração bucal
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
