
Homologous proteins occurring through gene duplication may give rise to novel functions through mutations affecting protein sequence or expression. Comparison of such homologues allows insight into how morphological traits evolve. However, it is often unclear which changes are key to determining new functions. To address these ideas, we have studied a system where two homologues have evolved clear and opposite functions in controlling a major developmental switch. In plants, flowering is a major developmental transition that is critical to reproductive success.Arabidopsisphosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein homologuesTERMINAL FLOWER 1(TFL1) andFLOWERING LOCUS T(FT) are key controllers of flowering, determining when and where flowers are made, but as opposing functions: TFL1 is a repressor, FT is an activator. We have uncovered a striking molecular basis for how these homologous proteins have diverged. Although <60% identical, we have shown that swapping a single amino acid is sufficient to convert TFL1 to FT function and vice versa. Therefore, these key residues may have strongly contributed to the selection of these important functions over plant evolution. Further, our results suggest that TFL1 and FT are highly conserved in biochemical function and that they act as repressors or activators of flowering through discrimination of structurally related interactors by a single residue.
Models, Molecular, Arabidopsis Proteins, Protein Conformation, Reproduction, Molecular Sequence Data, Arabidopsis, Plants, Genetically Modified, Evolution, Molecular, Phenotype, Amino Acid Substitution, Genes, Duplicate, Amino Acid Sequence, Sequence Alignment, Phylogeny, Plasmids
Models, Molecular, Arabidopsis Proteins, Protein Conformation, Reproduction, Molecular Sequence Data, Arabidopsis, Plants, Genetically Modified, Evolution, Molecular, Phenotype, Amino Acid Substitution, Genes, Duplicate, Amino Acid Sequence, Sequence Alignment, Phylogeny, Plasmids
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 453 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
