Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

SHORT COMMUNICATION: Comparison of 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine and [3H]thymidine for studies of hepatocellular proliferation in rodents

Authors: T.L. Lanier; P.I. Eacho; E.K. Berger;

SHORT COMMUNICATION: Comparison of 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine and [3H]thymidine for studies of hepatocellular proliferation in rodents

Abstract

Hepatocyte replication traditionally has been studied by [3H]thymidine (TdR) incorporation into DNA, and more recently using incorporation of 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine (BUdR), a synthetic analog of thymidine which is measured by immunohistochemistry. In studies to compare TdR and BUdR, mice were given the peroxisome proliferator [4-chloro-6-(2,3-xylidino)-2-pyrimidinylthio]acetic acid (WY-14643) in the diet (0.1%) for 5 days and either TdR (1 microCi/g) or BUdR (100 mg/kg) on days 2-5. The labeling index (LI) for hepatocytes of WY-14643-treated mice was 4.7% with BUdR and 5.2% with TdR. The LI for control mice was 0.3-0.4% with either label. Partially hepatectomized rats given TdR had a mean LI of 30.0 versus 32.0% in rats labeled with BUdR. Sham-operated controls given TdR had a mean LI of 0.2% and BUdR controls had a mean LI of 0.1%. Hepatectomized rats given TdR and BUdR simultaneously had an LI of 20.1% for TdR and 22.4% for BUdR. In these rats, 94.1% of the labeled cells contained both markers, whereas 1.9% had only TdR and 4.0% had only BUdR. Comparable labeling indices using either TdR or BUdR indicate that the analogs may be used interchangeably in short-term in vivo studies of liver cell proliferation.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    75
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
75
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!