Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of Plastic R...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
Article . 2021 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Earfold™: A combined approach with conchal bowl reduction

Authors: Dominika A. Michno; Norbert Kang; Wojciech Konczalik;

Earfold™: A combined approach with conchal bowl reduction

Abstract

Prominent ear deformity is common amongst the human population and is partly due to underdevelopment of the antihelical fold, a prominent conchal bowl, or both. Recently, the senior author described a minimally invasive technique for changing the shape of the antihelical fold using the Earfold™ implant (Allergan plc, Dublin, Ireland). However, there is still a paucity of data regarding outcomes from combing this approach with surgical techniques to correct conchal bowl hypertrophy.Questionnaire-based study evaluating outcomes in consecutive patients undergoing treatment with Earfold™ and conchal bowl reduction. Patient reported outcome measures were assessed with a validated questionnaire. Data on complications were obtained from the patient's case notes and free-text sections of the questionnaire.Completed questionnaires were received from 8 patients out of a total of 18 who underwent the combination treatment (44% response rate). Statistically significant differences were noted in nearly all questions (18/19) relating to changes in ear appearance as a result of the surgery, with all patients being satisfied following the combined procedure. Improvements in subjective outcomes were compared to previous studies evaluating treatment with Earfold™.The Earfold™ implant can be combined safely with other otoplasty techniques to achieve a good outcome in a carefully selected patient population.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Esthetics, Patient Selection, Ear Deformities, Acquired, Prostheses and Implants, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Quality Improvement, Patient Satisfaction, Physical Appearance, Body, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Female, Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Ear Cartilage, Surgery, Plastic, Ear Auricle

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!