publication . Article . Other literature type . 2017

Prioritizing a network for biodiversity

Albert, Cécile H.; Rayfield, Bronwyn; Dumitru, Maria; Gonzalez, Andrew;
Open Access English
  • Published: 01 Jan 2017
  • Publisher: HAL CCSD
  • Country: France
Abstract
International audience; Designing connected landscapes is among the most widespread strategies for achieving biodiversity conservation targets. The challenge lies in simultaneously satisfying the connectivity needs of multiple species at multiple spatial scales under uncertain climate and land-use change. To evaluate the contribution of remnant habitat fragments to the connectivity of regional habitat networks, we developed a method to integrate uncertainty in climate and land-use change projections with the latest developments in network-connectivity research and spatial, multipurpose conservation prioritization. We used land-use change simulations to explore r...
Subjects
free text keywords: biodiversity, corridors, habitat fragmentation, metapopulation, graph theory, species distribution models, Zonation, [SDE]Environmental Sciences, [SDU.STU]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Earth Sciences, [SDU.ENVI]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Continental interfaces, environment
Funded by
NSERC
Project
  • Funder: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
,
EC| DYVERSE
Project
DYVERSE
Vegetation dynamics and ecosystem services provision in a fragmented landscape in response to global change
  • Funder: European Commission (EC)
  • Project Code: 272284
  • Funding stream: FP7 | SP3 | PEOPLE
23 references, page 1 of 2

Adriaensen F, Chardon JP, De Blust G, Swinnen E, Villalba S, Gulinck H, Matthysen E. 2003. The application of 'least-cost'modelling as a functional landscape model. Landscape and Urban Planning 64:233-247. [OpenAIRE]

Andren H. 1994. Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos 71:355-366. [OpenAIRE]

Araújo MB, New M. 2007. Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 22:42-47.

Baguette M, Van Dyck H. 2007. Landscape connectivity and animal behavior: functional grain as a key determinant for dispersal. Landscape Ecology 22:1117-1129. [OpenAIRE]

Beier P, Spencer W, Baldwin RF, McRae BH. 2011. Toward best practices for developing regional connectivity maps. Conservation Biology 25:879-892.

Berteaux D, et al. 2010. The CC-Bio Project: studying the effects of climate change on Quebec biodiversity. Diversity and Distributions 2:1181-1204.

Bocedi G, Palmer SCF, Pe'er G, Heikkinen RK, Matsinos YG, Watts K, Travis JM. 2014. RangeShifter: a platform for modelling spatial eco-evolutionary dynamics and species' responses to environmental changes. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 5:388-396. [OpenAIRE]

Brodie J, Paxton M, Nagulendran K, Balamurugan G, Clements GC, Reynolds G, Jain A, Hon J. 2016. Connecting science policy and implementation for landscape scale habitat connecitivty. Conservation Biology 30:950-961.

Marrotte RR, Gonzalez A, Millien V. 2014. Landscape resistance and habitat combine to provide an optimal model of genetic structure and connectivity at the range margin of a small mammal. Molecular Ecology 23:3983-3998. [OpenAIRE]

Mazaris AD, Papanikolaou AD, Barbet-Massin M, Kallimanis AS, Jiguet F, Schmeller DS, Pantis JD. 2013. Evaluating the Connectivity of a Protected Areas' Network under the Prism of Global Change: The Efficiency of the European Natura 2000 Network for Four Birds of Prey. PloS one 8 (e59640) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059640 [OpenAIRE]

Meller L, Cabeza M, Pironon S, Barbet‐Massin M, Maiorano L, Georges D, Thuiller W. 2014. Ensemble distribution models in conservation prioritization: from consensus predictions to consensus reserve networks. Diversity and Distributions 20:309-321.

Minor ES, Lookingbill TR. 2010. A multiscale network analysis of protected-area connecitivty for mammals in the United States. Conservation Biology 24:1549-1558.

Mitchell MGE, et al. 2015. The Montérégie Connection Project : Linking landscapes, biodiversity, and ecosystem services to improve decision-making. Ecology and Society 20 (art. 15) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-07927-200415

Moilanen A, Franco AM, Early RI, Fox, R., Wintle B, Thomas CD. 2005. Prioritizing multiple-use landscapes for conservation: methods for large multi-species planning problems. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 272:1885-1891. [OpenAIRE]

Mumby PJ, Elliott IA, Eakin CM, Skirving W, Paris CB, Edwards HJ, Enriquez S, IglesiasPrieto R, Cherubin LM, Stevens JR. 2011. Reserve design for uncertain responses of coral reefs to climate change. Ecology Letters 14:132-140.

23 references, page 1 of 2
Abstract
International audience; Designing connected landscapes is among the most widespread strategies for achieving biodiversity conservation targets. The challenge lies in simultaneously satisfying the connectivity needs of multiple species at multiple spatial scales under uncertain climate and land-use change. To evaluate the contribution of remnant habitat fragments to the connectivity of regional habitat networks, we developed a method to integrate uncertainty in climate and land-use change projections with the latest developments in network-connectivity research and spatial, multipurpose conservation prioritization. We used land-use change simulations to explore r...
Subjects
free text keywords: biodiversity, corridors, habitat fragmentation, metapopulation, graph theory, species distribution models, Zonation, [SDE]Environmental Sciences, [SDU.STU]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Earth Sciences, [SDU.ENVI]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Continental interfaces, environment
Funded by
NSERC
Project
  • Funder: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
,
EC| DYVERSE
Project
DYVERSE
Vegetation dynamics and ecosystem services provision in a fragmented landscape in response to global change
  • Funder: European Commission (EC)
  • Project Code: 272284
  • Funding stream: FP7 | SP3 | PEOPLE
23 references, page 1 of 2

Adriaensen F, Chardon JP, De Blust G, Swinnen E, Villalba S, Gulinck H, Matthysen E. 2003. The application of 'least-cost'modelling as a functional landscape model. Landscape and Urban Planning 64:233-247. [OpenAIRE]

Andren H. 1994. Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos 71:355-366. [OpenAIRE]

Araújo MB, New M. 2007. Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 22:42-47.

Baguette M, Van Dyck H. 2007. Landscape connectivity and animal behavior: functional grain as a key determinant for dispersal. Landscape Ecology 22:1117-1129. [OpenAIRE]

Beier P, Spencer W, Baldwin RF, McRae BH. 2011. Toward best practices for developing regional connectivity maps. Conservation Biology 25:879-892.

Berteaux D, et al. 2010. The CC-Bio Project: studying the effects of climate change on Quebec biodiversity. Diversity and Distributions 2:1181-1204.

Bocedi G, Palmer SCF, Pe'er G, Heikkinen RK, Matsinos YG, Watts K, Travis JM. 2014. RangeShifter: a platform for modelling spatial eco-evolutionary dynamics and species' responses to environmental changes. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 5:388-396. [OpenAIRE]

Brodie J, Paxton M, Nagulendran K, Balamurugan G, Clements GC, Reynolds G, Jain A, Hon J. 2016. Connecting science policy and implementation for landscape scale habitat connecitivty. Conservation Biology 30:950-961.

Marrotte RR, Gonzalez A, Millien V. 2014. Landscape resistance and habitat combine to provide an optimal model of genetic structure and connectivity at the range margin of a small mammal. Molecular Ecology 23:3983-3998. [OpenAIRE]

Mazaris AD, Papanikolaou AD, Barbet-Massin M, Kallimanis AS, Jiguet F, Schmeller DS, Pantis JD. 2013. Evaluating the Connectivity of a Protected Areas' Network under the Prism of Global Change: The Efficiency of the European Natura 2000 Network for Four Birds of Prey. PloS one 8 (e59640) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059640 [OpenAIRE]

Meller L, Cabeza M, Pironon S, Barbet‐Massin M, Maiorano L, Georges D, Thuiller W. 2014. Ensemble distribution models in conservation prioritization: from consensus predictions to consensus reserve networks. Diversity and Distributions 20:309-321.

Minor ES, Lookingbill TR. 2010. A multiscale network analysis of protected-area connecitivty for mammals in the United States. Conservation Biology 24:1549-1558.

Mitchell MGE, et al. 2015. The Montérégie Connection Project : Linking landscapes, biodiversity, and ecosystem services to improve decision-making. Ecology and Society 20 (art. 15) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-07927-200415

Moilanen A, Franco AM, Early RI, Fox, R., Wintle B, Thomas CD. 2005. Prioritizing multiple-use landscapes for conservation: methods for large multi-species planning problems. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 272:1885-1891. [OpenAIRE]

Mumby PJ, Elliott IA, Eakin CM, Skirving W, Paris CB, Edwards HJ, Enriquez S, IglesiasPrieto R, Cherubin LM, Stevens JR. 2011. Reserve design for uncertain responses of coral reefs to climate change. Ecology Letters 14:132-140.

23 references, page 1 of 2
Powered by OpenAIRE Research Graph
Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue