publication . Other literature type . Article . Preprint . 2016

Probing MeV to 90 GeV axion-like particles with LEP and LHC

Joerg Jaeckel; Michael Spannowsky;
  • Published: 01 Feb 2016
  • Publisher: Elsevier BV
  • Country: United Kingdom
Abstract
Axion-like particles (ALPs), relatively light (pseudo-)scalars coupled to two gauge bosons, are a common feature of many extensions of the Standard Model. Up to now there has been a gap in the sensitivity to such particles in the MeV to 10 GeV range. In this note we show that LEP data on $Z\to\gamma\gamma$ decays provides significant constraints in this range (and indeed up to the $Z$-mass). We also discuss the sensitivities of LHC and future colliders. Particularly the LHC shows promising sensitivity in searching for a pseudo-scalar with $4 \lesssim m_a \lesssim 60$ GeV in the channel $pp \to 3 \gamma$ with $m_{3\gamma}\approx m_{Z}$.
Subjects
arXiv: Astrophysics::High Energy Astrophysical PhenomenaHigh Energy Physics::PhenomenologyHigh Energy Physics::Experiment
free text keywords: Nuclear and High Energy Physics, High Energy Physics - Phenomenology, High Energy Physics - Experiment, QC1-999, Scalar (mathematics), Physics, Nuclear physics, Collider, law.invention, law, Axion, Large Hadron Collider, Standard Model, Particle physics, Physics beyond the Standard Model, Gauge boson
Funded by
EC| HIGGSTOOLS
Project
HIGGSTOOLS
The Higgs quest - exploring electroweak symmetry breaking at the LHC
  • Funder: European Commission (EC)
  • Project Code: 316704
  • Funding stream: FP7 | SP3 | PEOPLE
60 references, page 1 of 4

[1] J. Jaeckel, A. Ringwald, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 60 (2010) 405, arXiv:1002. 0329 [hep-ph].

[2] R. Essig, et al., arXiv:1311.0029 [hep-ph].

[3] S. Alekhin, et al., arXiv:1504.04855 [hep-ph].

[4] E. Masso, R. Toldra, Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 1755, arXiv:hep-ph/9503293.

[5] E. Masso, R. Toldra, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 7967, arXiv:hep-ph/9702275.

[6] E. Masso, F. Rota, G. Zsembinszki, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 115009, arXiv:hepph/0404289.

[7] J. Jaeckel, E. Masso, J. Redondo, A. Ringwald, F. Takahashi, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 013004, arXiv:hep-ph/0610203.

[8] R.D. Peccei, H.R. Quinn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38 (1977) 1440.

[9] R.D. Peccei, H.R. Quinn, Phys. Rev. D 16 (1977) 1791.

[10] F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 279.

[11] S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 223.

[12] G.C. Branco, P.M. Ferreira, L. Lavoura, M.N. Rebelo, M. Sher, J.P. Silva, Phys. Rep. 516 (2012) 1, arXiv:1106.0034 [hep-ph].

[13] A. Broggio, E.J. Chun, M. Passera, K.M. Patel, S.K. Vempati, JHEP 1411 (2014) 058, arXiv:1409.3199 [hep-ph].

[14] M.J. Dolan, F. Kahlhoefer, C. McCabe, K. Schmidt-Hoberg, JHEP 1503 (2015) 171; M.J. Dolan, F. Kahlhoefer, C. McCabe, K. Schmidt-Hoberg, JHEP 1507 (2015) 103 (Erratum) arXiv:1412.5174 [hep-ph].

[15] E. Witten, Phys. Lett. B 149 (1984) 351.

60 references, page 1 of 4
Powered by OpenAIRE Research Graph
Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue